very useful info.. thanks to cricinfo!!!
Showing posts with label raves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label raves. Show all posts
Google's First Video Doodle - to Celebrate John Lennon's 70th Birthday...
Another interesting thing this time, is, Youtube also joins the celebration with its Logo change to this...
You can watch that video below:
This is what (the kind of things) i do to hav a lil brk, but still dont want to move away from this wonderful machine....
Below is the line which i entered in the Google Search Text Box.. just kept typing keys in keyboard...
Outcome: the max number of chars that can be entered in Google Search Text Box - 2048
asdjASPDk[weaskldlaskdfja;sdfap[ewrkpwerjlwkmasASDLFKJASDFLJASLDKFJWEE[Pasl;ldkfas'dff;laksdfldfkjasdrwpoeriwekmalsdfkasdcmsaldkfapweoirpweralskdf;alsdfwo[erk[we;sdfahefoiawerpmsdflkjasdfkjeiwoirj[wek;asldfasjdfiaewprjslkdfasdjpaoueposdlkasdmals;kepeorisejrfmlamdsklasndpa[psekweorlaksdem;las,cmkdnfvjsrfoiasdjmacalksdkapoweeuoiqweuaklsdjaplsndkamcxnofpaosdmlaksmdparwepeoirjpasldmaksmdpa[spidwpeorpsoesdmlaskdpaosidpoeirpoaslmdawepwoeirpoasomdl;askepweiweoprpasddaapoaasdmpapwoeqpwoierrowieprkalskdmpqookoasdlamspakpoweaonslkdnaposipqwejasokdjapaoesiwoalkwnsdmapseipoweaklsdmpaoseipowejaklsdmapsoeiqpwoaojoidwqorureottreopamdaslkapowesiweomclksdawpowsidpoweipqwlaaskpaosdqwpoeiqwpdmasklaseipwqeoqiwmaslkfjksejdffushdfiygeduewoirjwewoiaksdlaksndasppowiwewioeoaijsdpaosdaiojsioasjdaksndaopseiwoperuoepworoieruweiojweirwoienrwpoealsdjakskdpaskcxnedslopwqei3owqeklasdkaskdjefeuhwpeorpwieurosadkjf;alsdjoqiwerwplmdlsdamda;slopqwueiqwopaskdlekajdsmlaekawosjepqwokdalsdaposdioqwelasdmalsdaspoeqwiawdpsoasmdklasdpoausiouqw3epalsdkmaslkdkpowqoipeiqpwoeeijdas;lasldkasdkplasd,maepcqopweudasklalsdmaskdpqwoeas;ldkasdfl;kjas;dlalskdasldkjasodpqoweiqtuieoikdsmcxaflasjlka;sdjalsdfjweoupoqueoipwerpwoeksd;lasdkjfasldcmasdrwoiuerwqwpoerkwkersaddfoqewurqwoperjmsdkflmasdioreuwyqweoprusdalkdsafnwpeoriwerusadskdlfjlasdknewprjioweurkasndasjeoiakdndisadoieryqkowdsjlaksd0we9ruwioerjaklsdmwejd02384klasdwqeiru234klanseu3y58aqiwsakldnweoi54kwqneeoqwjeioqewpodmqowehoqiwe72klqwe8wklqwoiejqweqmdsnjkcvuewiwgfblbiasdfoisersdfaklsdfoiwoerjwoer9wreuhekroasdjasihfjdkgfjdpaoierqwpiqoejkasfdjfslkdfksdfjsdlfjsldfjo[qiwrejqwelfkas;dfakjsdfw94uro34jfklsadmvncxjpewojriqweproasfdkfjowoekrpowerksldajf0wierwierupotwejyisdafbvas;dfapsodfjqwoerkasdhewyrhdjskdljsduisdlasdweosdlkasodiafjklwerkeoepoasdfijfnvbxc;lmzcxcvpwerqpwoeripa;lsdfaslkdfnnghsdyiasefoiasoidsodsiiosdopwermlasdopiasutweorpkasmdlmfa;adslaskdrj4pwouw3piu45p3welkmasdlkcmsvoejfdoialkmdf;oalsjfd;ngf;dalsfglasldfkasl;dkfj3w3owireusalkdmfls,d cxszzkfwsdfhjowq iweohroiwoeruwpoierjwklqemdslkrjwoiqehrlkwelmcsalkdjfroiq
Many who like Work like this????
Hope that "Many" turns to "Everyone"!!!
Few very interesting, but TRUE, words i read today, in my horoscope....
" There is no guidebook that shows you specific steps to bridge the gap between you and anyone else, so you'll have to take a risk. Instead of opening the discussion with a know-it-all attitude, just admit that you don't have all the answers and are willing to listen now. "
You might have heard about 'backward compatibility' in programming. for those who wonder what jargon am i talking about, let me give you a quick explanation. "In programming languages, backwards compatibility refers to the ability of a compiler for version N of the language to accept programs or data that worked under version N-1" (thanks to wikipedia). To explain it in English, its just a newer system, still be able to understand and communicate fluently with the previous old system. let me not confuse u more (hope u got what is backward compatible).
Lets now take a different route. lets talk about human interactions. when it comes to human, i dont like to measure the compatibility comparing with his/her own previous stage/version. Its measured between two persons, over time period or entire life. well, how do we define 'version's? i define it based on the person's experience, like, a person gets to a higher version, if he/she gets a sudden change, from which you see the same world little differently, which means gaining new experience. And the frequency of this version change is indirectly proportional to the age, whereas the version number is directly proportional to the age. By "between two persons", i'm not refering to just life-partners only, or to-be life partners only. This two persons can be related with any relationship, like dad/mom-son/daughter, lovers, life-partners, grandpa/grandma-grandson/granddaughter, or any distant relationships like relatives or beyond any relationship like friends. Also it does not depend on the gender of the two persons.
When two persons of same version has conversation, it always goes smoothly. The problem arises when there is difference in the version between the two person, or some version change happened just to one person among the two. The output of the conversation depends on how the communication between the two different version person flows. The lower version person (being in the modern world) may have advanced thinking and desires based on the present scenario. but still, the higher version person may reject your message, because its not sent in the proper way which the higher version person can accept it . So, instead of valuing your message, the higher version person simply considers the message from lower version person as invalid (which in lower-version standards, is very valid message). And the similar event happens when the higher version sends message to the lower version person, which is again rejected by the lower version person, considering the message as invalid. So, it always proves that, its always a problem when there is conversation between two different version persons.
So, Whats to solution to this problem? This has to be looked from two different views. First, from the lower version person: you haven't got/gained enough experience, hence you're in lower version. so, try to have "forward compatibility", by re-coding yourself in such a way to get the messages from higher version, decode it properly, and accept it if valid, otherwise, reply to that message in a way, which that higher version person can understand properly. Secondly, from higher version person: you might have got more experience, but some of which may be outdated. so, try to be "backward compatible", so that u can receive the message from lower version person, decode it properly, accept it if valid, otherwise, reply to that message in a way that lower version can understand properly.
When you consider yourself, you have persons with lower version, as well as persons with higher versions. Hence, to have smooth conversations/relationship, always learn to be both backward and forward compatible.
(I know. into too much of programming suddenly, may result in such kind of posts having stupid way of explaining things. cant help. please bear with me for some more time huh.. ;) )
Lets now take a different route. lets talk about human interactions. when it comes to human, i dont like to measure the compatibility comparing with his/her own previous stage/version. Its measured between two persons, over time period or entire life. well, how do we define 'version's? i define it based on the person's experience, like, a person gets to a higher version, if he/she gets a sudden change, from which you see the same world little differently, which means gaining new experience. And the frequency of this version change is indirectly proportional to the age, whereas the version number is directly proportional to the age. By "between two persons", i'm not refering to just life-partners only, or to-be life partners only. This two persons can be related with any relationship, like dad/mom-son/daughter, lovers, life-partners, grandpa/grandma-grandson/granddaughter, or any distant relationships like relatives or beyond any relationship like friends. Also it does not depend on the gender of the two persons.
When two persons of same version has conversation, it always goes smoothly. The problem arises when there is difference in the version between the two person, or some version change happened just to one person among the two. The output of the conversation depends on how the communication between the two different version person flows. The lower version person (being in the modern world) may have advanced thinking and desires based on the present scenario. but still, the higher version person may reject your message, because its not sent in the proper way which the higher version person can accept it . So, instead of valuing your message, the higher version person simply considers the message from lower version person as invalid (which in lower-version standards, is very valid message). And the similar event happens when the higher version sends message to the lower version person, which is again rejected by the lower version person, considering the message as invalid. So, it always proves that, its always a problem when there is conversation between two different version persons.
So, Whats to solution to this problem? This has to be looked from two different views. First, from the lower version person: you haven't got/gained enough experience, hence you're in lower version. so, try to have "forward compatibility", by re-coding yourself in such a way to get the messages from higher version, decode it properly, and accept it if valid, otherwise, reply to that message in a way, which that higher version person can understand properly. Secondly, from higher version person: you might have got more experience, but some of which may be outdated. so, try to be "backward compatible", so that u can receive the message from lower version person, decode it properly, accept it if valid, otherwise, reply to that message in a way that lower version can understand properly.
When you consider yourself, you have persons with lower version, as well as persons with higher versions. Hence, to have smooth conversations/relationship, always learn to be both backward and forward compatible.
(I know. into too much of programming suddenly, may result in such kind of posts having stupid way of explaining things. cant help. please bear with me for some more time huh.. ;) )
Few links which was really interesting to me, which i came across today...
Your answers to 10 tricky children's questions!
This week the Magazine posed 10 awkward questions children ask their parents. Here are suggestions, from readers and experts, on how to answer these stumpers. I really like the Scientific Answers explained few of the most tricky questions like "Whats Time?"
Read the complete article @ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8200022.stm
hans-christian-orsted-google-doodled!
Me a small fan of this Doodles by Google...
Read the full story on the above doodle @
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/aug/14/hans-christian-orsted-google
bothai enbathu
oru paambu visham thaan...
saernthu kudicha
athu oru socialism thaan....
oru paambu visham thaan...
saernthu kudicha
athu oru socialism thaan....
raaman aandaalum,
raavanan aandaalum,
enakkoru kavalaiyilla.....
naanthaanda,
en manasukku raja...
raavanan aandaalum,
enakkoru kavalaiyilla.....
naanthaanda,
en manasukku raja...
Posts
